This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The article is NPOV because it asserts that there is a concensus that the right to an adequate standard of living exists. In American politics, asserting that a politician believes that there is a right to such is a commonly-made attack on a politician's integrity; at the very least, this needs to be mentioned, and some of the frequent counterarguments referenced. Almafeta (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
I will remove the globalisation tag you have added. The article deals primarily with the right to an adequate standard of living in international human rights instruments, without specific country examples. In relation to NPOV - the right has been recognised in the named international human rights instruments, there is no assertion that there is a consensus or all agree with that. You can add info regarding the particular US situation you mention, but you will need a source.--SasiSasi (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
If the issues have not been addressed, please return the tag. Whomever fixes it should be the one to remove a cleanup tag. Almafeta (talk) 23:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)