Talk:Ripon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Is Ripon Cathedral a Cathedral or a Minster??

I don't know. The name seems to suggest it is a Cathedral, doesn't it. The following passage from Ripon Cathedral I think clarifies that it is what it sounds:

"The minster finally became a cathedral (the church where the Bishop has his cathedra or throne) in 1836, the focal point of the newly created Diocese of Ripon and Leeds - the first to be established since the Reformation."

In which case... should the sub-heading be 'cathedral' instead of 'minster'? Popexvi 13:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Either all the schools should have their addresses or none should. I vote none. Suicidal mongoose 17:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; it's not particularly encyclopedic information. — Matt Crypto 18:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oldest City[edit]

I know Ripon is the oldest city in England, but cannot place an exact date and am unable to verify if it is the oldest in the UK. Can anyone enlighten the article as to this information?

Ripon was granted city status in 1836 to coincide with the creation of the Diocese of Ripon. See City status in the United Kingdom. Owain (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Quite so. There seems to be some confusion among the civic authorities themselves, who have celebrated anniversaries based on the supposed creation of the borough (not city) in AD 886. Which story apparently originates in the imagination of an eighteenth century antiquiarian. It all centres around the charter horn which was supposedly presented by Alfred the Great. See the following:
[1], [2], [3]
The whole controversy probably merits a mention (in particular the reluctance to allow carbon-dating in case it doesn't give the results they want!). Lozleader 09:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has been listed in "The Top 10 of Everything" as being the oldest city. Popexvi 20:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's simply not true.
Going by the bishoprick argument, the first city would be Canterbury, obviously. It may or may not have the first or second dateable charter to survive: what we definitely do know is that our written records of Dark Ages England are non-existent at worst, generally terrible, and patchy at best. So equating "oldest known borough" with "oldest borough" is nonsense enough: further taking this to "oldest city" smacks of dishonesty on the part of civic authorities.
Aa random example of how hard this type of thing is, my home town, Leicester, is definitely a named roman settlement. It pops up a few times in contemporary records, but the origins of the Portmanmoot are obscure: tradition suggests they pre-date the Norman Conquest at least, but there is no dates, no charters. There's some evidence that the the city itself has probably been continously settled and populated from the establishment of it by the Romans, and Leicester was important enough to become the seat of a bishop in 680. It's very likely there was some form of municipal government then that evolved into the Portmanmoot: but we can't be sure. That's just one example. There are hundreds of other boroughs in the country with equally obscure origins. Ripon's corporation may well even pre-date the charter it has a record of: in this era charters had an actual effect in legal terms, and were frequently revoked and then reinstated (perhaps with a fine or different terms). Morwen - Talk 23:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is true, Morwen. Look at The Top Ten of Everything 1999 by Russell Ash. The post in front was made by Popexvi 07:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This maybe a mixup of the terms "town" and "city". It clearly isn't the oldest city as that status only dates from 1836! Owain (talk) 09:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's got the oldest cathedral in Britain, by a certain definition (part of Ripon cathedral - the saxon crypt - is older than any part of any other British cathedral); but that's a different matter.... TSP 10:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is still a tendency for laymen to relate city status with the presence of a cathedral, so this may well be the answer to the confusion. Yorkshire Phoenix (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Three Bridges[edit]

I seem to remember that there are three bridges (the two old ones and the new bypass) over the river Ure located at Ripon and what about mentioning Ripon Racecourse. There is also the Canal, which I seem to remember was/is the most northerly part of the canal system. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.104.55.241 (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

City status[edit]

When I was growing up in Ripon, I was told that Ripon also became a city in recognition of its role as a supplier of spurs to royalty. Is this not the case? BuzzWoof (talk) 12:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wilfrid and coat of arms.png Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Wilfrid and coat of arms.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Ripon[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Ripon's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "2011 census":

  • From Whitby: "Key Figures for 2011 Census: Key Statistics: Area: Whitby CP (Parish)". Neighbourhood Statistics. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
  • From Beverley: "Key Figures for 2011 Census: Key Statistics: Area: Beverley CP (Parish)". Neighbourhood Statistics. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  • From Filey: "Key Figures for 2011 Census: Key Statistics: Area: Filey CP (Parish)". Neighbourhood Statistics. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 7 February 2013.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Ripon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ripon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ripon/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

#Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  1. Requires more photographs

Keith D 18:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Needs restructure to accord with WP:UKCITIES guidelines
  2. Needs expanding when missing (see 1 above) sections are added
  3. Lead section needs reworking to accord with WP:LEAD
  4. Needs more inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
--Harkey Lodger (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 04:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ripon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The bot will not load/boot up/energise/get up and running (whatever the current phrasing is). The joy of all things (talk) 08:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ripon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ripon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA potential[edit]

Looks in good shape. Add a section on Geography and one detailing the notable landmarks, ensure that every paragraph is sourced and verifiable. I'd be happy to review it for Good Article if it is further improved.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Blofeld I have updated the geography section, though I can install more later. Cast you beady eye over it please and correct/adjust where you feel necessary. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 19:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1974 reform[edit]

If the City of Ripon Act 1865 recognised Ripon as having city status, why is it referred to as a town in 1974 - "No. 46255". The London Gazette. 4 April 1974. p. 4401. Is this because it had not received letters patent before this time - as noted in Beckett, City status... p.27. EdwardUK (talk) 16:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ripon&oldid=1210057660"