Talk:Rivington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRivington has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 10, 2010Good article nomineeListed

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rivington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additions in March 2017[edit]

Recent additions have been reverted because of poor quality references, adding information that adds WP:UNDUE emphasis to minor details and adding information in the wrong sections. This is a settlement article, linked to numerous others where more detail might be relevant. It has been through the GA process to ensure the quality of its prose. Snippets of information are rarely useful and it is better to use the original source for old newspapers which can be accessed online, often via public libraries or subscription. J3Mrs (talk) 08:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed[edit]

Information appearing under Industries suggests a mill was located in woodland close to the reservoir, John Rawlinson identifies two mills, in his book About Rivington, 1969, neither were located in the village and neither were used for corn. A mill existed next to Rivington Hall, these two mills are not mentioned in the article here. He does mention a facility being built to create cement for the reservoirs construction using water power, its location is not specified. Unless the statement can be verified it is pure speculation to state a mill existed in the current woodland and does not belong. See here Verifiability --Pennine rambler (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are reading things into that statement that don't exist as there was no suggestion of woodland or the reservoir in that section of the article. I have added a map as a reference that does mention Mill Hill and a smithy. The conservation area map mentions Mill Dam Wood. I could simply have added the map but I rewrote it. Please read what is written, not what you think it means. J3Mrs (talk) 11:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Added citations is standard practice and they are now added, it certainly improved this rubbish "Foundations of a building that was perhaps a water mill or the manor corn mill are to be found opposite Mill Hill Cottages next to where a possible mill pond was shown on the 1848 first edition Ordnance Survey map" --Pennine rambler (talk) 12:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The rubbish was sourced to the conservation appraisal document and has been reinstated. J3Mrs (talk) 11:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wilderwood[edit]

In the article under Industry is mentioned "Wilderswood Colliery, owned by Nicholas Fish, appeared in the 1869 Mines List." however the above colliery is not in Rivington, it is in Horwich. Any source to show that it provided employment to Rivington? The citation added "Coal Mining History Resource Centre" does not say so. It is some distance from the village which was known more for agriculture and weaving.

"Wilderwood Colliery, Horwich, near Bolton was worked over a large area by various concerns front the late eighteenth century to 16 August 1960. A large number of shallow shafts and adits accessed two seams, the Little Mine and the Great Mine. Rowland Adamson (RA) signed its abandonment plan on closure." Citation: Coal Mining in Lancashire & Cheshire, By Alan Davies, 2013, 32, (ISBN: 9781848684881)

Also http://www.daveweb.co.uk/wilders1.html

--Pennine rambler (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It never said it was in Rivington, it was there for context but now it isn't. 14:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Rivington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]