This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Capitalizing the "c" in Robocop is idiotic. I am looking at the DVDs of ALL seven movies right now. The only time "cop" is capitalized is when all the letters are. Otherwise, they spell it "Robocop." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 00:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Dick Jones is NOT the Senior VP of OCP. He is the Senior President. He is referred to this in the film several times. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Dick Jones is the Senior President. "The Old Man" is either the CEO or the Chairman. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
I was going to suggest that Officer Boscorelli rewatch the movie, but seeing as he's banned, I don't think that's necessary. Thanks for the backup there Harizotoh9. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SChaos1701 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
There are plenty of results in Google Books that focus on this film. In terms of determining a primary topic, the other articles are mere extensions of this film, which transcends the rest in having "long-term significance... it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term". Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 22:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Oppose This is the primary topic by far, everything originates from this film. DWB(talk) / Comment on Dishonored's FA nom! 23:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Oppose - As the franchise originated from this particular film, this article about it is the primary topic so the move is not necessary here. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Strong oppose. The primary topic in this case is either the initial film or the franchise as a whole, and the original work should generally get the spot until it is clearly shown to be superseded, as when the original is not particularly notable but later installments make the series notable. This is the opposite case, where the original remains by far the most important installment in the franchise, more important than all others combined. bd2412T 02:59, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Oppose at least until the new film is out and we have an idea if it surpasses or equivalent to the original. (It doesn't sound like it is, but one never knows). Come 2-4 months from now and this 2014 film has clearly become the new version of Robocop, then we can talk disambig, but not now. --MASEM (t) 03:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Recent change(s) placed the movie as taking place in 2014. There is nothing in the movie itself to indicate that this is the year the movie takes place in. The book suggests it taking place in the 2040s oor 2050s and the TV series suggests sometime in the 1990s but as for the movie itself? Nothing in it tells us the year. Edited the opening to the plot summary to remove the reference to the movie taking place in 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)