This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Tolkien never referred to the language of the Rohirrom as "Rohirric". He either referred to it as "Rohan" or "Rohanese". The term "Rohirric" was actually coined by Robert Foster in his book The Complete Guide to Middle-earth. Perhaps a name change on the article is warranted? RashBold 17:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Tolkien actually used the word "Rohirian". Should we move this page? --Urbane legend 17:55, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The number of Google hits for Rohirric[1] is far greater than the hits for Rohirian[2] or Rohanese[3]. (I get 13,900, versus 338 and 158 respectively.) The information given here should of course be included in the article, but for the name we should follow WP:NC and use the most common name, since in this case it's very clear which one that is. EldKatt (Talk) 16:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I asked the Q&A people at www.theonering.net, a reliable source of Tolkien scholarship. This is the reply I received:
"The word "Rohirric" appears nowhere in Tolkien's published writings, nor "Rohirian", although the latter would parallel forms that do occur, like "Telerian" for the language of the Teleri. In most cases, JRRT simply used "Rohan" as the adjective for the language, parallel to "Hobbit" in Appendix F and the draft for that material in "Peoples of Middle-earth" (History of Middle-earth XII). In an essay on the names of the rivers and beacon-hills of Gondor (published in Vinyar Tengwar #42), he uses "Rohan" the same way, and in a single case, "Rohanese". "Rohirric" appears to be Robert Foster's own coinage; it may date from his 1971 article in _Mythlore_ #1, "The One Inconsistency in LotR", although it may have appeared earlier, in the version of his "Guide" that appeared in The Tolkien Journal (which I cannot check personally)."
Perhaps this page should be moved to Rohan (language) with Rohirric and Rohirian redirecting there? I appreciate that Rohirric is the most common result on Google, but that's not a reason to give a Wikipedia page an inaccurate title. --Urbane legend 03:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). I could argue further, but the guideline and its rationale should be enough to make my point. If you think it worthwhile, I wouldn't mind an explanation of why this title is "inaccurate", aside from the fact that J.R.R. Tolkien didn't use that particular term. It evidently (see Google links above) reflects the current usage splendidly.
A more neutral title (such as your suggestion Rohan (language)) is an idea. I'd certainly consider it if there were any uncertainty as to which of the possibilities to choose. As of yet, I'm far from convinced that there is. EldKatt (Talk) 11:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
In deference to arguments already raised, I agree that Rohirric is the appropriate title for this page. As the Rohirric, Rohirian, or Rohanese question is (I feel) noteworthy in relation to Tolkien's own choice, I've put a short paragraph at the bottom of the article explaining the differing uses. --UrbaneLegend 16:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Háma - shouldn't the translation be "home, homewards" as derived from OE hām as in "Farmer Giles of Ham" (a typical linguist pun by Tolkien)? I don't have the sources ready right now but "cricket" doesn't really work. --M.Buelles (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In what sense doesn't it work? Háma is a minor character who might only be mentioned by a nickname. The translation is sourced to a dictionary of OE. —Tamfang (talk) 20:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article is super interesting, however, it seems a lot of the sources do not mention Tolkien at all, and so would count as Original research. Wikipedia isn't the place to publish your own research into Tolkien's languages. The most obvious example is the list of words similar to Mercian, which links directly to a Mercian dictionary. All sources should be to research that has made the connections. Can someone find such research? It seems likely that it has been done. Sorry to be a spoil-sport. Ashmoo (talk) 11:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
