Talk:Roma Street railway station

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Roma Street railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Start‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Busway[edit]

Should this page be merged with the Roma Street Busway Station page, as Roma Street Station? Rods42 (talk) 11:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Security risk[edit]

Will someone please edit the main page to include the fact NO photography is allowed at roma st railway station due to the fact it's a security risk please. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.187.57.69 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 20 September 2006.

Sure, if you can provide a source for that information. FiggyBee 22:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes, the obese platform attendant —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.200.240.176 (talk) 23:31, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CitytrainBrisbane/Navigation template breaking[edit]

I have found that the reason for the CitytrainBrisbane/Navigation template breaking is because, it seems, 'too much' is included in the page with collapsible templates. Viewing the source of the article, this message is commented-out as a hint as to what is going wrong:

WARNING: template omitted, pre-expand include size too large

Removing all the TL Route Display Table stuff in a preview fixes the problem. Will a Roma Street railway station, Brisbane (bus routes) page be needed again? SEO⁷⁵ ^[talk] 06:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Innocently browsing the page today, it appears that something behind-the-scenes must have changed as this problem is no longer. SEO⁷⁵ ^[talk] 04:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roma Street railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]