This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
"This conclusion is not fully convincing, though, due to the weak comparative analysis. The development of American tank doctrine is adequately covered, but the side argument about Soviet "glubokii boi" is not fully developed. Finally, no matter of revisionism, indeed, not even the eventual victory, can excuse the bottom line, which is unsuccessful operations and terribly high casualty rates." Is this an opinion of one of Jarymowycz's critics, or from whence does it come? It doesn't have a source listed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 17:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Nowhere is it mentioned that he was a fantastic teacher who made history come alive for his students (even if he was somewhat sexist). He was. I will never forget him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 19:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)