Talk:Romanization of Belarusian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Belarus  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Writing systems (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Examples[edit]

The examples table needs one or two more words, to demonstrate the transliteration of the letters х and й, and perhaps with ю or я at the beginning and in the middle. Michael Z. 2006-02-13 23:32 Z

isn't it: ROMANIANIZATION of Belarusian?[edit]

I think is write in this way to mention.

Romanization means conversion to the Latin (Roman) alphabet. Romanianization, or Rumanization, is something else. Michael Z. 2006-02-14 22:39 Z

Anonymous, I reverted your revert to an earlier version. My original edit summary covered the problems with table formatting, but I didn't mention some other problems: that the new location of note references changed the scope of the notes which applied specifically to Łacinka, and not to the Cyrillic letters in general, and that the table formatting made the main article headings pile up on the right side of the tables in my web browser (Safari/Mac). Michael Z. 2006-02-14 22:51 Z

I don't understand the reason of the undeletion. The message I deleted wasn't based on any official info, was misleading and promotional. None of the other systems' entries carry a promotional message with them. This isn't a comparison of systems but an index. So why undeletion? Yury Tarasievich 21:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Could someone help? Two articles (BGN/PCGN romanization of Belarusian and Romanization of Belarusian) contain different information regarding Ь (ь). By the first article this latter should be converted to "’" (apostrophe), but according to the second article — not. Ang15 (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

According to the source, the soft sign in the BGN/PCGN romanization system should be represented by an apostrophe.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); August 24, 2011; 19:58 (UTC)
I'll correct the table then. Ang15 (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)