 |
 Note: Discussion related to disclosure of information related to the Rorschach test should be conducted at Talk:Rorschach test/disclosure. Please also review the archived discussions on this matter. |
|
Note: For historical reference, discussion regarding the inclusion of the images primarily happened at WP:Requests for comment/Rorschach test images and Talk:Rorschach test/images. |
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable in order to ensure a quality article, and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding objectionable content. |
[edit] Edit request from 208.54.40.226, 23 September 2011
 |
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove the pictures of the Rorschach cards and the description of common responses. This is copyright material and affects test validity.
208.54.40.226 (talk) 23:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
N Not done, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rorschach test images and Talk:Rorschach test/images--Jac16888 Talk 23:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Should there be a warning about the possibility that reading this will mess up your tests?
I'm not for nor against for the moment, but i was wondering, should this article have a little note up top warning people that according to some, by reading this article you might negatively affect the accuracy of the tests performed on you in the future? --TiagoTiago (talk) 02:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Is there some proof of that? It seems much more likely to me that reading the article will positively affect the tests. I say that there should be no such warning unless some RS has objective evidence of a negative effect, and then the warning should be limited to the negative effect demonstrated. Roger (talk) 03:21, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- "It seems much more likely to me that reading the article will positively affect the tests." - Do you understand the concept behind this test at all? 96.18.69.186 (talk) 21:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you think that the article is incomplete in its explanation of the concept behind the test, then please go ahead and improve it. Roger (talk) 22:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles. This suggestion has been made before, both here and at various other articles. It has always been shot down by a significant margin. Resolute 03:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
-
- Actually, I do not think that this proposal is covered the five standard disclaimers. (But I think that such a disclaimer is unlikely to be helpful anyway.) Roger (talk) 04:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not needed. Unless psychological textbook place this warning on them which of course they do not. And we would need evidence.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Psychological textbooks do not show the actual inkblots used in the test. 96.18.69.186 (talk) 21:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- They in fact do. Check out [1] [2] and [3] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:49, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
|
Note: Discussion related to disclosure of information related to the Rorschach test should be conducted at Talk:Rorschach test/disclosure. Please also review the archived discussions on this matter. |
Fifelfoo (talk) 04:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Note: Discussion related to disclosure of information related to the Rorschach test should be conducted at Talk:Rorschach test/disclosure. Please also review the archived discussions on this matter.
