Talk:Rosiglitazone
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rosiglitazone article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| WikiProject Pharmacology | (Rated C-class, High-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Medicine | (Rated C-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Initial comments
It might be worthwhile to critique the Nissen study here for its questionable methodology, as well as include more recent study information re increased CV risk. Also, might be worth to mention of Rosiglitazone's effect of LDL metabolism (see Thiazolidinediones review by Hannele Yki-Järvineni, 2004; figure 4). --Xris0 (talk) 18:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
The statement in WIKI that "In February 2010, David Graham, the FDA's associate director of drug safety, recommended that rosiglitazone be taken off the market." is wholly inaccurate. David Graham, the reviewer of the FDA's office of surveillance and epidemiology estimated in a memo dated October 2008, 2008 mind you, stated it should be taken off the market".(First word) Graham has publicly been criticized by the FDA in the past for his opinions.(WIKI)----DM 08:28, 20 June 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.80.63.2 (talk • contribs) [Bangalore, India]
[edit] Not sure whether it's worth mentioning
A generic version of this drug is available outside of the US. It is manufactured by Cipla Ltd. (India) and is called Senzia. InsultComicDog (talk) 00:54, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] July 9, 2010 article
Caleb Hellerman (July 9, 2010). "Key diabetes drug study was flawed, review charges". CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/07/09/avandia.diabetes.research.fda/?hpt=T1.
-- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- And here from the NYT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/health/10diabetes.html?src=me&ref=health Gandydancer (talk) 11:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Nissen/Wolski
They've done an updated meta-analysis. OR was 1.3 for MI but no change in cardiovascular death - http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/170/14/1191. Probably citable after the recent raft of additions. JFW | T@lk 10:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)