Talk:Rosso Fiorentino

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The third paragraph just, em, stops right there. So someone needs to finish this article. FunnyYetTasty 01:29, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I got rid of this: Although many major museums have examples, it did not help that his masterpiece was and is in a city off the normal tourist track. [1] because the sentence isn't really relevant to the subject of the article (or even the paragraph), makes a judgment about what is considered Fiorentino's masterpiece, and uses questionable style ('it did not help'). Also, the page being cited seemed irrelevant to the topic. -vekron (talk) 20:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand these concerns at all, & have readded the point rephrased. Johnbod (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]