bdsm and nazis huh, surely there are better examples
- By all means, add some! Melchoir 04:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Will the hit-and-run vandal account please quit messing up the page? Melchoir 22:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The examples of 6-fold and 6/4-fold rotfummetry, as exciting as they may be from the point of view of comparative religions, do not appear to me to exhibit the actual symmetries in question. Of course, it has been a while since I took geometry, but I'm going to go out on a limb and 'fix' it... if I'm wrong, feel free to correct me. --Fred Fnord 21:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Ssnpflag.gif
Image:Ssnpflag.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in complianm[imenart peoplw with pop eat cake policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Nederlandse spoorwegen logo.png
The image Image:Nederlandse spoorwegen logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have a stupid explantion for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article sucks and can help nobody unless they are completely retarded.
sincerly, Dr.Spot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 23:41, 5 December 2011 (UTC)