Talk:Russian monitor Edinorog
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|Russian monitor Edinorog has been listed as a Warfare good article under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do, and if it no longer meets these criteria, it can be reassessed.
Review: December 20, 2013. ( ).
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|A fact from Russian monitor Edinorog appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 6 December 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian monitor Edinorog/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- Review will be posted in the next few days.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 17:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- No disambiguation links.
- Copyright tags for the pictures look fine.
- No neutrality issues.
- No missing in-line citations.
- No original research.
- Article is stable.
- I've yet to detect any major spelling or grammatical errors.
- When was the picture created? The date listed on File:Monitor Edinorog.jpg (1863-1957) is the date of the ship and not the picture.
- Link the entire phrase "long overall" to Length overall, not just "overall".
- Link to Baltic Fleet.
- Is Engstrem gun worth a redlink?
- Link Soviet to Soviet Navy or Soviet Union.
- Briefly explain why the Soviets were forced to withdraw.
- All done; the date of the picture has to be during or after the 1870s as she's been modified with the sponsons on the turret to mount the light guns, so it could possibly be as late as 1900 when she was decommissioned. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)