This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support per nom. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no argument for this proposal. An empty claim of no primary topic is no reason to change a title. What, if any, are the other uses? What are the page views for each? How can people weigh in without knowing any of this? --В²C☎ 15:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, there is no point in moving this article to the disambiguated one and leaving the original title a PRIMARYREDIRECT to it, as apparently proposed. Is the proposal to create a two-entry dab page at the basename? Who does that help? Currently, those seeking the character are taken directly to the article they seek, while those seeking the football player are one hatnote link click from their destination. With a dab page at the base name NOBODY searching with this name is taken to the article they seek, and EVERYBODY needs to click again to get to their destination. So nobody is better off, and half are worse off. Changing to strong oppose. --В²C☎ 15:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose as per the reasons stated above. The current link is should stay the same. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 12:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – pageviews signify a primary topic. No indication on wikinav that people are often clicking the hatnote (the American football player doesn't even show up). No indication that people would be looking for Ryan McNeil Lamswood either, and that's just a partial title match. Skarmory(talk •contribs) 02:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
