Talk:Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Journalism (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Poland (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Untitled[edit]

I removed the logo of "Rzeczpospolita" (it's outdated!) and replaced it with a sample cover of this newspaper. Looks nicer, besides I think we should let people see "the best-designed newspaper". Elisma 10:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Elisma

"one of world's best-designed newspapers" - sources please;) 81.18.195.90 15:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

broadsheet no more[edit]

since october 15th 2007 rzeczpospolita has compact size (tabloid?) and is no more broadsheet. as you can see, i'm not able to write in english, so i'm just letting you know source: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rzeczpospolita_(gazeta) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.190.155.157 (talk) 11:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rzeczpolita newspaper.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Rzeczpolita newspaper.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Political profile[edit]

What is exactly the "link" to Law and Justice in

"It does not favour any particular party within Poland's present political landscape, although its editor is linked to the Law and Justice." ?

Any source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.138.213.13 (talk) 11:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Current affairs[edit]

Can someone with Polish language skills please fold in the following sources to the 'Current Affairs' section (although be careful about WP:RECENTISM )...

http://www.tvn24.pl/12692,1678355,0,1,plan-likwidacji-z-powodow-politycznych,wiadomosc.html http://www.pb.pl/a/2010/10/15/Wniosek_o_rozwiazanie_spolki-wydawcy_Rzeczpospolitej?readcomment=1 http://wyborcza.biz/biznes/1,100896,8519757,Ostra_klotnia_udzialowcow_Presspubliki.html http://www.rp.pl/artykul/9211,550124-Skarb-chce-rozwiazac-Presspublike.html

Thanks -Chumchum7 (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Political profile section[edit]

Could someone please provide sources for the comparison to "The Times", plus qualify what "a moderately national taste" means. In comparison to what? From my readings of some articles on "historical debates", I would certainly not qualify their taste a being "moderate". They certainly read as heading towards being 'extremist nationalist', if not already there. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)