Talk:Séance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Paranormal (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Death (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Obama refrence[edit]

You should mention obama in this article using the term

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/07/obama.seance/index.html?iref=topnews#cnnSTCVideo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.249.55 (talk) 06:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

George Lyttleton reference - why?[edit]

Is there any evidence that the "Dialogues of the Dead" was anything but a literary device he copied from an ancient Greek rhetoritician (and others)? If not, this reference should be removed as irrelevant and confusing. HistorianKris (talk) 10:49, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Seance photo not credible?[edit]

Is the photo at the beginning of the article from 'The Haunting In Connecticut, or is it just me? I think thats a photo of the chief mortician and some attendees, and not a real photo of a legitimate seance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.150.162.65 (talk) 18:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Séances in the media[edit]

This section seems to be an unreferenced and unverified collection of random instances. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections, is there any reason to keep it? Cusop Dingle (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, I have boldly removed it. Cusop Dingle (talk) 17:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)