Talk:SG-1000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Video games (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Sega task force.
 

Games List[edit]

It pretty much seems few people care about the SG-1000 :( which is sad, it gave birth to Wonder Boy for a start! Anyway I've added a games list fo the Mark I/Mark II, I figured adding it to the page would be more sensible than making a seperate one (like the Mega Drive or Saturn has) because there's so few. I'm pretty sure that the list is complete. I used a Emulation site as reference but obviously for thier sake I cannot post as a source, though if you check various emulation sites, you should be able to find the total amount of games mixed in with the Master System titles. Hope this is alright - Dwitefry, 18:24 6 July 2008

Taiwanese name[edit]

I'd like to see a translation of the Taiwanese name "阿羅士" for the console added... A quick altavista translation gives "Arab League Gentleman", which I'm guessing is not the correct term :P --71.124.173.134 22:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Games list[edit]

The paragraphs after a few of the sections on the list of SG-1000/SC-3000 series games need revision. Could anyone with knowledge of the SG-1000 help to clarify these?--Classicrockfan42 (talk) 06:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Sega SG-1000 in France[edit]

"and in other countries, such as France": do you have a source and more information about the release in France? I can't find any on Internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.220.166.253 (talk) 12:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Only SC-3000 was released in Australia and Europe (including France). The original SG-1000 was only released in Japan and New Zealand, whilst the SG-1000 II was only released in Japan and Taiwan. 124.120.245.117 (talk) 08:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:SG-1000/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 14:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 14:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm looking forward to it whenever you're ready. I tend to think it's pretty interesting and it was a tough one to find information for. Red Phoenix let's talk... 13:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
@Taylor Trescott: Hey, not to get antsy here, but it has been two weeks. Are we going to start soon? Red Phoenix let's talk... 04:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Whoops. Sorry, you were right to be antsy. Sometimes I get forgetful.

  • Infobox: Why is "Cassette tape" capitalized?
  • "and other countries" How many other countries? If it's just like 2 then I don't think it would be overkill to include them.
    • Unfortunately, the sources aren't really clear on how many other countries the system actually arrived in. It is known it didn't make it to North America or the United Kingdom, but it did to Japan, Australia, and a couple of countries in Europe. Red Phoenix let's talk... 21:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Gulf & Western redirects to Gulf and Western, so this article should use "and"
  • "as the SC-3000,[5][6] also known as the Sega Computer 3000,[7] as well as the upgraded SC-3000H." How come "SC-3000" is not bold?
    • It is bold in the lead already. My understanding is that you bold when that term redirects to the article. Actually, SC-3000H may not need bolding, so I'll remove it. Red Phoenix let's talk... 21:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
  • "Following the buyout in 1984" Since you have previously given the year of the buyout, it seems repetitive to state it again.
  • "defines the SG-1000 as an 'abject failure', but calls the SG-1000 and the SG-1000 Mark II" Seems like a repetitive usage of "SG-1000"

I will put it on hold. Well done. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 21:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

@Taylor Trescott: That should be it. Red Phoenix let's talk... 21:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)