This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I think consideration need to be given to a merge of this page with Ecclesiastical architecture. Ecclesiastical is the correct term given architecture pertaining to religion. Giano | talk 21:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I notice the headings are sometimes relating to the religion (Hindu, Islam), other times it is by time period(Medieval, Modern and post-modern), still other times it is by style (Gothic, Baroque). Is there a better way to organize this structure? Bytebear 18:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Sacred architecture v's Religious architecture
It god-smacks and disbehoves me the suite of uniformed rationales that my peers provided for keeping the rubric "Religious architecture" instead of the inclusive auspice nominated... when the change of category was completed none of the aforementioned peers have re-qualified the opening paragraph which is still as per my edits. They clearly took a deep interest in improving the article: *coff coff* . Uniformed democracy is anathema! Altars, standing stones, sacred groves, mandala, medicine wheel and temenos are sacred architecture but they may not be religious architecture...
*shakes head* B9 hummingbird hovering(talk • contribs) 03:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)