This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Hi I have noticed contributions by User:Ausgoth which seemed to be erroneous and redundant in which he insists on despite warnings and reminders to use the talk page first. He insists on his edits despite the majority of the users agree that most of his inputs are either redundant or erroneous and his reverts are incorrectly classified. I hope we could reach a consensus on what to do with this user as he already tends to disrupt and downgrade the article, Thanks! JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
There has been a dispute on this article for over a week new. Rather than issue blocks, I've fully-protected this page and have invited those involved to participate; I do not usually fully-protect articles that I've made a few edits to but I would prefer to have a discussion. My protection is not an endorsement of the current version. Acalamari 11:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
First and foremost I would like to thank Acalamari for the page protection as Ausgoth seem to edit the article at his own pleasure despite majority of the users agree on reverting his edits which are either erroneous and/or redundant. Blocks and warnings have been implemented towards him and despite all of that after it expired, he just returns back to his old ways by reverting those edits by other users and puts back all his edits which the majority does not agree with causing a one versus all war on the article which was not present prior to his first edit in the article. Users such as ViperSnake151 would agree on me with this one as he also reverts all of the edits by Ausgoth due to similar arguments about Ausgoth's edits. Hope we could reach a consensus not only regarding the article, but also with User:Ausgoth and the disruption he is making in the article. JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 11:57, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Firstly, the model numbers in the body like that are just useless cruft. I have objections to those full-on tables of models simply because I think they violate the "Wikipedia is not a catalog" rule, but everyone who objects to me cries it's useful. Now, on the stuff about the lockout; I don't get what his problem with the sourcing is; and I have seen no other source actually make the assertion about the lockout system that this random Russian site is making. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The Note 3 is compatible with the Note 2 Smart Dock
While Samsung has not promoted the fact that the Samsung Smart Dock for the Note 2 works with the new Note 3, the Smart Dock does indeed work with the Note 3. This extends the power of Note 3, transforming it into a mini desktop.