Talk:Samsung Galaxy S series

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

The i9500 is noted as having 4G LTE[edit]

The i9500 is noted as having 4G LTE ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.5.68.1 (talk) 15:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, According to the reference the Exynos 5 Octa SoC has got 4G LTE but it can not be matched with processor as well as Qualcomm's Snapdragon chips can, That is the reason why Samsung hasn't used i9500 with Exynos processor in western countries. --Faramarz^♚♔♚

No, the i9500 does not have 4G LTE. This is specifically the non-LTE version. The i9505 has LTE and the version with Exynos 5 Octa + LTE is the SHV-E300. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S4#Octa-core_variant Qasdfdsaq (talk) 13:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other Galaxy S Phones?[edit]

Shouldn't phones like the "Samsung Galaxy S Relay 4G" (T699), and "Galaxy S Note", "Galaxy S Note II", etc. be mentioned here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.34.245.114 (talk) 21:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two scroll bars please![edit]

I think a horizontal scroll bar should be both above and below, not just below, for the growing comparison section...

Snapdragon in the s5?[edit]

Can somebody please source this? TechInsight says they moved to the Broadcom BCM4354 SoC

comparison table is too long, vertically[edit]

it needs to be broken up, say 768 pixels height for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dskjfs3ej38j (talk • contribs) 17:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SIM card type[edit]

Please add table row data for the type of SIM card each phone uses (mini-SIM, micro-SIM, or nano-SIM). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.79.37.238 (talk) 11:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why div overflow-x:scroll?[edit]

In the section Comparison there is a <div style="overflow-x:scroll">, which makes it impossible to scroll right in IE and in Chrome. This is a very bad choice which makes it impossible to see the columns of S III, S4, S5 and S6. I propose removing style="overflow-x:scroll". Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 07:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Battery[edit]

There should be a line in the table that shows which if the battery is removable. --MrBurns (talk) 12:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move the comparison table to a new page?[edit]

I propose creating a new page entitled "Comparison of Samsung Galaxy S smartphones" and moving the comparison table to that page. The layout of the pages would be similar to that of the Google Nexus page, where the phones and a brief description are listed on one page, and a comparison table is listed on the other page. Snowsky Mountain (talk) 18:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Series.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Samsung Galaxy S22.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Samsung Galaxy S22.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Galaxy S10e Black.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

eSIM[edit]

Please add in eSIM capability eg S20 models and onwards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.218.18.193 (talk) 00:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about Samsung Galaxy X[edit]

There is a discussion at Samsung Galaxy X regarding the appropriate target for that redirect. Editors, especially those with knowledge of Samsung Galaxy products, are invited to share their views there. — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Samsung Galaxy S Plus into Samsung Galaxy S series[edit]

Although reliable sources do exist, it isnt sufficient enough to be it's own article, and thus could be a section on the Samsung Galaxy S series article. Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the content go to Samsung Galaxy S (2010 smartphone) instead?

Note that the "versions" of the S (L, Plus, Player, Advance, Duos, Duos 2, Duos 3) (see Template:Samsung Galaxy S) aren't all referenced either on Samsung Galaxy S series or on Samsung Galaxy S (2010 smartphone). By the way, are those versions all considered flagship-quality smartphones? The RedBurn (ϕ) 09:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing: no support; no support for counterproposals; discussion stale. Klbrain (talk) 09:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]