This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Inviolability → Sanctity of life — I think the title is a bit inaccurate. This article should be about the concept, which is sanctity, not inviolability, which is instead a property of the sanctity concept. True one can say that life is inviolable , but its more accurate to say that life is sacred and its this sanctity that is inviolable. -Stevertigo (w | t | e) 23:55, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Support weakly although a more neutral phrasing would be better still. Laws, treaties, institutions, cities, customs, principles, and sacred or cherished feelings, can all be inviolable, so this is fatally ambiguous. SeptentrionalisPMAnderson 01:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Support as the article appears to currently be about "sanctity of life" and that's surely the more recognizable term for the topic. Propaniac (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Are there sources that justify redirecting inviolability here? I've most often heard the term in relation to the status of a diplomat or priest, and not of an embryo. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)