Talk:Santa María de la Cabeza castle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DivaKnockouts (talk · contribs) 02:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Lead

• The fort has underwent several renovations due to damages caused by violent earthquakes that have shaken the city in the last centuries: --> The fort has undergone several renovations due to damages caused by violent earthquakes that have shaken the city in the last centuries...

Description

• The bulding was designed under the strict typological canons established in the seventeenth century. With a regular and proportionate floor based in geometry; the bastion is the main element applied as a defensive technique in the construction of the fort. This typological technique was spread in Latin America since the beginning of the sixthteenth century, and is known as the "permanent bastioned fortification" — Citations? Also, you include some of this in the lead and now here without a citation & there is a quote here. Really needs citations.
  • Oh. This shouldn't be quoted. I will remove the quotes. And the citation is later in the paragraph :)

Origins

• Everything looks fine here.

History

• This probably left underground the slopes and terraces present in the 1737 map by Diaz Fajardo.[6] — Could you reword this? Confusing. This left what underground the slopes? If so move the "the" to in front of "underground".
  • Fixed, I guess.
• During a powerful earthquake occured througout the state in 1797, the Santa María de La Cabeza castle suffered heavy damages; it was partially destroyed. --> During a powerful earthquake which occured througout the state in 1797, the Santa María de La Cabeza castle suffered heavy damages; it was partially destroyed.

Gallery

• Everything looks fine here.

Further reading

• These websites seem useful. Good here.
  • Additional reading always comes in handy :P

Refernces

• These looks good.

— DivaKnockouts (talk) 04:08, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you for the review. I've addressed all. thank you :) — ΛΧΣ²¹ 04:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

• Okay, great. Now passing and you're welcome :) — DivaKnockouts (talk) 04:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·