Talk:Savoy Theatre

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gilbert and Sullivan Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gilbert and Sullivan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gilbert and SullivanWikipedia:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanTemplate:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanGilbert and Sullivan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Content[edit]

At the end of the section on Richard D'Oyly Carte's theatre, I have hidden two lots of information that do not seem to me to be notable/relevant enough in the present context. Perhaps others could consider.

In the Rupert D'OC section, is it quite correct to include details of Toye and Norris - who didn't, unless I misread Rollins and Witts, ever conduct at the Savoy?

Worth putting in something about Richard introducing the queue for cheap seats (instead of the previously prevalent scrum) and Rupert abolishing it by making all seats bookable? Tim riley (talk) 10:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the first two bullet points - this information mostly doesn't belong in this article, and I streamlined it. Yes, by all describe the matters that you note in the third bullet point. Nice work on the article today! -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ambassadortickets.com/Savoy-Theatre/Information[edit]

... this link has been removed by an editor as "a commercial website". I note the former 'official' website of the Ambassador group now redirects to this site. The site does not appear to sell tickets for theatres that are not members of the group. This appears to me to be the new 'official' theatre page for the owners of the theatre. As before we accepted that the previous link was indeed a commercial link, so I would suggest that the current link be reinstated - unless someone can identify a better 'official web-page' for the theatre. A commercial link for the 'thing' under discussion does not normally count as WP:SPAM; although obviously we need to take care that it is indeed the 'official site'. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I've replaced it just in the ELs (not in the infobox) pending any further consensus. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

savoy court[edit]

The explanation of the reasons for right hand traffic flow along savoy court is in my opinion incorrect. Until 1897 when the first electric cabs were introduced, yes that's right, Electric, cabs were horse drawn of which there were two types, the four wheeled four seat carriage known as a Growler because of the grumbling sound their wheels made over the cobblestoned streets and the two wheeled two seat Hanson safety cab, I doubt very much if the driver of a growler would be able to reach the right side door handle from the drivers seat, the Hansom cab had the driver sitting up high at the rear of the cab with the doors at the front, again impossible, The Savoy theatre is situated at the bottom right of Savoy court and with traffic, mainly cabs, entering normally on the left hand side of the road and dropping passengers at the theatre would cause Que. of traffic across the entrance to the hotel, a change in the road traffic regulations was sought from parliament to allow traffic to enter on the right to stop the hotel entrance from being blocked, this also allowed for the empty cabs to pick up hotel guests leaving the hotel. it is also suggested that the small roundabout in front of the hotel entrance is the reason for the 25ft turning circle requirment for all London taxicabs, this is wrong, at the time of the first conditions of fitness (the rules for London taxicab construction) being written the majority of taxi ranks were situated in the centre of the road, taxis needed to be able to U turn from a central rank to pick up a passenger at the kerb who was traveling in the opposite direction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Standsonapole (talk • contribs) 01:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Savoy Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407074515/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/185052-UKs-Ambasssador-Theatre-Group-Acquires-Complete-Ownership-of-West-Ends-Savoy-and-Playhouse-Theatres?tsrc=nx to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/185052-UKs-Ambasssador-Theatre-Group-Acquires-Complete-Ownership-of-West-Ends-Savoy-and-Playhouse-Theatres?tsrc=nx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]