Talk:Schema crosswalk

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability of the term "Crosswalk" ?[edit]

Does this term have any use in the metadata world outside of MARC?

It's a common enough concept (usually wrapped up in the "XSLT as panacea" fallacy), but I'm unfamiliar with this word being used to describe it. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have only recently come across this term having started work in medical data analysis in the USA - I would prefer to use the more familiar and generic term Lookup but it is certainly used in a commercial environment ourside of MARC --Rekstout (talk) 14:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a lookup. Rather than a mapping from one value to a single axis, it's a mapping of axes to other axes. You might perform a lookup afterwards, to translate values within each axis, but "crosswalk" as described here is about the management of these axes, rather than just their values within one of them. If anything, it's a necessary (but distinct) precursor step to it). Andy Dingley (talk) 21:36, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have also come across this term working in medical data analysis in the USA. I had not heard the term before. I was very surprised to see that the page was all about museum archives. The way I've seen it is, for us (a health care provider) to get reimbursement for each patient, we must deliver 2 electronic files to the payor: a main file and a crosswalk file. The main file is automatically generated from our records and has standard patient info, while the crosswalk file has additional info that this particular payor wants that was not generated automatically. Both files have the patient's account number as an element, so when the payor gets it they know whose main file goes with whose crosswalk file. 67.110.143.19 (talk) 17:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This an extremely vague comment, but I think I hear "crosswalk" used in environments with database roots other than Microsoft SQL. I'm thinking specifically of higher ed database Banner, which is Oracle-based. bendodge (talk) 19:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Schema crosswalk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080720134522/http://libraries.mit.edu/guides/subjects/metadata/mappings.html to http://libraries.mit.edu/guides/subjects/metadata/mappings.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]