Talk:Arthur Schopenhauer's criticism of the proofs of the parallel postulate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Germany (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

should be deleted[edit]

This isn't an encyclopedia article at all, just a string of quotes.--76.167.77.165 (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

There are three quotes. There are three sections of explanation. There is a "Notes" section. It is all factual material. There are no subjective statements by Wikipedia contributors. This article is related to the history of mathematics and contains information about a postulate that is crucial to the difference between Euclidean and non–Euclidean geometry.Lestrade (talk) 13:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Lestrade

Title not quite right[edit]

Currently the title of this article is "Schopenhauer's criticism of the proofs of the parallel postulate". I believe it should be "Schopenhauer's criticism of attempts to prove the parallel postulate", since "the proofs" never existed. Duoduoduo (talk) 23:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)