Talk:Sentinelese people

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject India / Andaman & Nicobar (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Andaman and Nicobar Islands (marked as High-importance).
 
Note icon
This article was last assessed in March 2012.
WikiProject Ethnic groups (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Negrito inter-relatedness[edit]

I removed the following recently-inserted para:

they don't even make fire. They are pygmy negritos, which means that they are related in race not to the modern day populations of Asia but closer to the Mbuti pygmies of the central African rainforests and the Khoisan peoples of southern Africa. They are assumed to be the descendants of the first modern homo sapiens sapiens to colonise the world, and most of whom have now been replaced elsewhere by later population migrations. Small negrito groups do exist in places such as Vietnam, leading us to the conclusion that these were the original populations of the area, later replaced by South Chinese settlers. The fact that only the Andaman Islanders have retained their own language, while other groups have been overrun by migrants at different stages of history, shows just how isolated these people are.

Apart from its awkward phrasing, while it has indeed been speculated that the Andamanese share some genetic heritage in common with various other widely-dispersed peoples who have been identified as negritos, and that they represent the remaining descendants of some "earlier wave" of migration, this has not yet been "proved". The idea does warrant mentioning, but IMO not in the form given above, needs to be more carefully portrayed (and also, referenced). I think it best that this text be reworked.--cjllw | TALK 22:58, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

"Negritos" are an apparently paraphyletic catchall, and any six-footer who waves a 4-foot barbed arrow at me with his flatbow surely does not qualify as "pygmy" in my book. Dysmorodrepanis 09:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Citation needed[edit]

I'd like to see a cite for this statement:

"A curious incident occurred on March 29, 1970, when the research expedition's surveying party found themselves cornered on the reef flats between North Sentinel and Constance Island: A group of Sentinelese men threatened them with bows and arrows from a distance, but the situation was eventually broken up by Sentinelese women engaging the men in a mass orgy in the face of the amazed researchers, after which most of them retired to the forest with only a few guards overseeing the escape of the surveying party."—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.118.198.251 (talkcontribs) 7 Febuary 2007.

The above incident is a none-too-delicate retelling of an encounter by a group of Indian anthropologists which included T.N. Pandit. It may appear in his book, but a quote from either him or one of his companions describing the incident is reproduced online here in the Andaman Book by George Weber's Andaman Association. It'd probably be better to work the actual quote into the text and cite it.--cjllw | TALK 07:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I see this has been done now, but it now suffers the opposite problem in that it is very coyly phrased, to the extent that is unclear exactly what the nature of the "display" was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.193.245.14 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Banner/Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Andaman and Nicobar Islands or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 05:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Slave trading[edit]

"Their social practices have been almost entirely free of external influence since the end of slave trading three centuries ago." Why is slave trading mentioned in the article? 87.70.11.29 (talk) 12:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I haven't checked, but I think that line is new as I have read the article lots of times and it's the only thing I don't remember. Presumably it means that slavers used to visit the island, but some more detail should be given. Salopian (talk) 14:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Slaving is mentioned because it was an external influence. And presumably the or a reason for the islanders' hostility. Probably in Nat Geo somewhere; I don't remember where I read that. kwami (talk) 14:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Source[edit]

Fire: yes or no?[edit]

"there is no evidence of either agricultural practices or methods of producing fire." "Fires are maintained as embers inside dwellings, possibly assisted by resin torches." So do they have fire or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.82.132.35 (talk) 23:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

You can have fire w/o being able to produce fire. Not the same thing. — kwami (talk) 05:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
All that can be said is that officials from the Andaman Islands confirm that smoke sometimes rises from the islands. As for agricultural practices, from satellite photos it is clear there are no fields, but I don't have anything that resembles a source for that. -- Llehsadam (talk) 06:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

"cease" vs "ease"[edit]

I have to wonder if the change from cease to ease is valid since this is a quote rather than a description. Is "cease" a mistake from the original quote? Hue White (talk) 22:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Confusing length of arrows[edit]

Under the heading "Culture" the following sentence is found:

"The arrows are over 1 m (3 ft) long. The harpoon- or javelin-type arrows are nearly half as long again, about the same length as the bows (over 3 m (10 ft)), and can also be thrown or used for stabbing, but the latter probably only rarely."

There must be an error here. If regular arrows are "over 1 m ... long" and harpoon-type arrows are "nearly half as long again", that would make the latter about 1.5 m long. But that is not "about the same length as the bows (over 3 m (10 ft))".

Which measurement is right, 3 or 1.5 meters?

I have googled the phrase "harpoon- or javelin-type arrows" and found 43 results using the exact same wording, except that the harpoon-type arrows are in nearly every case said to be 5 feet long, which seems much more reasonable. Presumably, the copied text is from an earlier (and correct?) Wikipedia version and the 3 m claim is an error introduced later on, but without access to the original source (unnamed in the text) I cannot edit the article.

--Filursiax (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

In this video from the researchers that visited the island in the 80s, the arrows are stated as being 2.5m long. They also show one of the arrows. -- Llehsadam (talk) 06:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

"Slightly more males than females"[edit]

Is it not a bit ridiculous to state that "there appears to be slightly more males than females" when so little is known about the population that estimates range from 40 to 500? --2A01:E34:EE33:210:DC60:44A4:E3F3:CA65 (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)