Talk:Sexuality in China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject China (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Sexuality (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

How this article misrepresents this issue (i.e. China is still very conservative regarding this and just about everything else)[edit]

It's true that you could meet some free-thinking people in China, and see homosexual couples in China, etc., but still the average person in China has very traditional view of this. Did this article mention how if there is ever an advertisement for underwear, or breast enlargements, they always use obviously non-Chinese people. Note how there is no Chinese article about this subject... Spettro9 (talk) 19:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

China class rating[edit]

considering the questions raised, and the scope of the article, i dont think this article is a "B" class article. its either "C" or "Start". I have downgraded to "C" conservatively.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:57, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Change from what[edit]

This article discusses nothing except the opening up and change of chinese attitudes, but without any idea of what old attitudes were and how they might still exist in the society, this article is deeply flawed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.43.65 (talk) 06:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)