Talk:Sheffield incest case

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sheffield incest case article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 November 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

British crime (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles

Pedophilia Article Watch (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch articles

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Sheffield incest case is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sheffield

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article name and scope[edit]

In spirit with my WP:BLP1E, I think we need to restructure the article to cover the event rather than the person. I agree that the current state of the article is much better and I commend Sticky for his tremendous work expanding it, but as with Josef Fritzl which redirects to Fritzl case, we should do the same with this article. Regards So Why 08:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly agree. JohnCD (talk) 23:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sheffield incest case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090122110422/http://itn.co.uk:80/news/fd565027c0747f9ca568a437fe87f679.html to http://itn.co.uk/news/fd565027c0747f9ca568a437fe87f679.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Brown quote[edit]

I restored Gordon Brown as the source of the quote in the first sentence of "Response of government and local authorities". This had been changed in a fairly obvious act of vandalism in this edit: [1]. I can't find a source for the exact quote given but he did say something similar in an answer to Clegg at PMQs on 26 November 2008, see here: [2] --rbrwr ^± 07:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult to understand sentence[edit]

The following sentence under the heading "British Fritzl" is hard to understand:
"Unlike in previous cases, no disclosure of police records or child protection files by corrupt (ex)-professionals who had worked the case was necessary for him to be exposed notwithstanding the injunctions."
Hopefully someone familiar with the intention could fix it, thanks.