This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Gurera (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
This article needs to be cleaned up to conform to the Manual of Style. The intro needs to be redone, and some of the wording should be rewritten. Please stop removing the tag.--Cúchullaint/c 01:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Six plus years later and....--Malerooster (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, i don't feel there was any need of putting this tag of COI on this article, which has already been filtered and edited by senior editors and experienced contributors (Titodutta & Mark Arsten). The article is fully content based with proper References. I can't find any significant or substantial problems with the article's neutrality.
So what if the major contributor of the article appears to have a close connection with its subject - As long as the factual detail or any other kind of conflict is concerned, only such contributors can help with their efforts to wikify the text with the guidance of senior editors and experienced contributors as in this case. Also such contributors can be considered with an open mind if they them-self declare honestly that one have close connection with the subject, at least through responsible editors and contributors. No portion of the text in this article appears to make it in a category of biased or what ever. Since till date no specific problem had been explained on the article's this talk page, so I'll request the editors to reconsider this tag and remove it at the earliest. Rgds. Micky (talk) 08:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about the 2013 version, but the current version was still full of puffery, tangential details and name dropping - unfortunately a common problem with COI-edited articles. I have cleaned up these issues and removed the COI tag afterwards. GermanJoe (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
