Talk:Shock Troops (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Presented by" credit[edit]

The phrase "presented by" credit appears three times in wikipedia. Here, The Man with the Iron Fists and Jerry Perenchio. The other two articles put "presented by" in quotation marks. Their are also grammatical issues involved. I ask Lugnuts to please reconsider his decision to remove the quotation marks. I will start a RFC if necessary. - Fantr (talk) 18:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts undid the quotation marks. I reverted him claiming "quotation marks are necessary otherwise people may wonder what 'presented by credit' means and question if the sentence is correct or even complete." Lugnuts re-reverted me claiming "no they wont". - Fantr (talk) 19:59, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts is blocked for 36 hours effective 3 February 2013 at 16:28. Please give him sufficient opportunity to respond in this thread. Thanks. - Fantr (talk) 19:59, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the quotation marks help define the type of credit. Otherwise, the sentence does not appear smooth. Alternately, maybe one could also say produced-by. Erik (talk | contribs) 20:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Produced by" won't work because Saltzman does not have a producer credit. - Fantr (talk) 20:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, brain fart. I meant "presented by" or presented-by. Erik (talk | contribs) 20:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Presented-by doesn't look right. I prefer to be consistent with other wikipedia articles. Further, "presented by" in quotation marks is standard. I cite the following RS works where the phrase appears in quotes when appearing before the word credit:

Siegel, Howard (2004). Entertainment Law (3 ed.). New York State Bar Association. p. 283.
Crabb, Kelly (2005). The Movie Business: The Definitive Guide to the Legal and Financial Secrets of Getting Your Movie Made. Simon & Schuster. p. 237. ISBN 9780743264921.
Cumbow, Robert C. (2008). The Films of Sergio Leone. Scarecrow Press. p. 1. ISBN 0810860414.
Schmuckler, Eric (23 June 1997). "Plan of the Year: Best use of National Television: Thompson, Ford: a much better idea. (J. Walter Thompson Co.'s advertising campaign for Ford Motor Co.'s sponsorship of "Schindler's List" broadcast)". Mediaweek. 7. A/S/M Communications: 698.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
Jones, Alan (1992). "Filming Clive Barker's Horror: Hellraiser III". Cinefantastique. 23 (2.3): 20. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)

This is a random international sampling. Numerous other legal books, trade industry publications and media articles use quotation marks in this context. - Fantr (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation marks seem proper, then. I endorse that approach. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I want to wait for Lugnuts to return. - Fantr (talk) 21:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]