|WikiProject Physics / Fluid Dynamics||(Rated B-class, Mid-importance)|
|WikiProject Aviation||(Rated Start-class)|
I don't see how a shock wave can be electromagnetic, or otherwise propagate in free space. I think the defining difference between a sound wave and a shock wave is that non-linear effects are important in shock waves. David R. Ingham (talk) 10:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, the article is not didactic about it. Must be corrected/improved. About "electromagnetic shock waves" see Shock waves in astrophysics... Well, suggestions for re-writing fragments of the article? --Krauss (talk) 12:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
People's interest shock wave!
The Meteor entering event at 2013-02-15 caused a peak in page views (pictured): the page views rose from 700 to 7000 in one day (!), the day of the Russian Meteor... When people not understand WHY stone fragments or explosion not caused damage (by heat or crash)... The unique damage was by this strange concept, the "meteor's shock wave".
- First day: ~10 times more than average visitations (~7000 = 10 * ~700).
- Second day (people reading about the event in the day after): ~18 times more than average visitations (~12500 = 18 * ~700).
This is a pulse wave phenomena, propagating "energy of interest" through the "Web medium" :-)
- If you take as reference Saturdays only, the ratio at the 2nd day is about 27 instead of 18. --Rainald62 (talk)
Limit on density?
A colleage of mine remembers a calculation combining three basic laws of physics with the astonishing result that the density ratio before/after a schock in gases may not be larger than six. If this is true,
- what are these laws?
- are there limits of applicability? (dissociation, ionization)
- He found the source. The answer is conservation of energy and mass, and the ideal diatomic gas. Obviously, this is not applicable to the bow shock in front of the meteor but only hundreds of meters away from its track.
- --Rainald62 (talk) 16:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)