Talk:Siddhashrama

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

is this not against wiki rules to have such a page as an advertisement?

Siddhibaikuntha !![edit]

Please mention about Siddhibaikuntha in another article. There is no proof that Siddhashram is related to Siddhibaikuntha. If you think Siddhibaikuntha is related to Siddhashram, please give references. Saravana Kumar K (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

ksaravankumar: I didn't bring siddhabaikuntha in the section of siddhashram though i first brought Gopinath, pilot baba, sai kaka and Sri Akshnnanath mahaprabhu hoping that the horizon of siddhashram will be broad but then narrowmindedness of yours of course narrows it down, anyway goodluck, lol.Theprofessordoctor (talk) 11:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Personal Opinions and Vandalism on this Page[edit]

Need Moderators help to stop vandalism based on personal opinions on this page !! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksaravanakumar (talkcontribs) 04:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Please provide citations for what you are stating. Wikipedia is not a place to state your personal beliefs. Saravana Kumar K (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Oshodhara's sole motive is to defame Dr. Narayan Dutt Shrimali. Whatever he is adding to the Siddhashram page is baseless and a bizarre figment of his wicked imagination. He must be banned. Nikhilashish (talk) 21:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

this page should be deleted as it is more like an advertisement of siddhashram, and sachchidanand. existence of sachchidanand can not be verified. he more looks like an imaginary person. Lnhonestbuddy (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Need moderators help to stop vandalism based on personal opinions. someone had edited this line "Further more, it is also believed that the divine personalities like Ram, Krishna, Buddha, Shankaracharya, and Ma Anandamai etc. are present along with their bodies at Siddhashram." how ever this line is completely based on his own personal view, and can not be verified at any cost. Lnhonestbuddy (talk) 13:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

This page is giving misleading information to readers see this points:- 1. if this place is for saints and sanyasi, then what angels (apsara) are doing here, isn't that contradictory. 2. editor has written "Param Pujya Dada Gurudev Sacchidananda Maharaj" (dada guru means his guru's guru) word in this page, but no proof of sachchidanad's existence is available. furthermore not even any image of him is available on the internet. then how this person is claiming him as dada guru. can he provide a proof that sachchidanand has meet him in real life, can he provide proof that sachchidanad is dada guru of that editor. it is clear that both these Points are editor's sole imagination. Lnhonestbuddy (talk) 18:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

References by Many people[edit]

Many people who are blind flowers of siddhashram pariwar whether international or national or local in many parts of india and nepal do believe that siddhashram is created by satchidananda and Narayan Dutt Shrimali is the chief controller there as Nikhelesworananda but this is just one sided view cause there are many who refute this claim of Shrimali, pilot baba being the foremost and now as many disciples of shrimali has turned to the side of pilot baba from Shrimalis line it makes one think over it. And we know there are many views in it, Gopinath has completely unique view and i believe it is by far the most important and pilot baba too has his own unique view and then shrimali's too is in itself unique and again this man Lord Sri Akshunna is also unique and makes a great sense so i feel everything must be provided for and against both in the article and people must be given a fair right for himself or herself to chose for on what is right and what is wrong. Theprofessordoctor (talk) 19:25, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

This article would clarify all your doubts Wikipedia:Verifiability. Make sure the article is based on the rules of Wikipedia. The claims of various people cannot be verified in such a topic as Siddhashram, please note the start of Article. It says Mythical Land. If you have any references to add for Modern times, please do so with Proper Citation. If you do not have a Citation, DO NOT write about those claims in the wikipedia article. If you write that someone has challeged others views, you should give a link to a AUTHENTIC source. Whatever you have written was totally Baseless. Please avoid writing Baseless comments in a Wikipedia article. Saravana Kumar K (talk) 12:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
LOL. As i first brought Gopinath in this article there was no problem because there was nothing against Shrimali from his side but when i brought pilot baba then there was problem. look how much people can be bias. i am for all so i like shrimali as i like pilot baba and gopinath and all but then i am simply not a blind follower of this or that because i feel one should be open and unbiased and the voice from the other side as well must be listened and thought over. This is the reason why i was in favour of adding more in the aritcle but not in favour of deleting sections in the article. Anyway i am not good in the computer so there might be some technical problem for sure and there might be some misunderstandings too from my side on it , so i am happy and want to thank ksaravan kumar for his pointing in this matter, seems like he is young and quite good in computer. But then i would have strongly liked him to be open minded for sure. And i just don't understand what he means by authentic citation, does he mean only the web site of shrimali's siddhashram is authentic and not of pilot baba? Doesn't he know that Pilot Baba and Gopinath are as famous as shrimali and they are authoritative and reliable in matter of yoga and tantra.Or is it that he is one who knows only about shrimali like a frog who feels his pond is the only mass of water that is called ocean, perhaps he needs to be little courageous and move forward in exploring to see the real ocean. Theprofessordoctor (talk) 16:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Theprofessordoctor - You should only be writing notable information on Siddhashram here in the article. I have noticed that there is NO reference to Dr. Shrimali or Siddhashram in Pilot Baba's website. Show me the direct link where Siddhashram is referenced. Your citation is not valid. This is SPAM. Please stop SPAMMING a site like Wikipedia. Also in the teachings of Gopinath, he only speaks about GYANGANJ, Not SIDDHASHRAM. This kind of information you supply in unauthentic and is considered Original Research. Why are you writing about unwanted stuff like GYANGANJ, Siddhabaikunta in Siddhashram topic. Please take it as my final warning before I report you to the Wikipedia Moderators. Saravana Kumar K (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Ksaravanakumar - Thank you for making aware of many of wiki's policies as i told you i am not good in computer and of course in wiki's way. You seem to be an indian so i feel like saying if you have real courage then why don't you go in pilot baba asram in delhi and buy kriyayoga video that was presented in nepal and see for yourself whether he speaks against shrimali or not. By the way how rightly the sages say "Little knowledge is dangerous", how come you say that Gopinath hasn't spoken for siddhashram? Are you just making a judgement without reading a book, better go to vanaras and buy his two books Siddhabhoomi Gyangunj and Mrityuvigyan o karmarahasya and see for yourself whether he uses the word siddhashram or not, hindi to aati hoga na aapko? By the way a little direction for you if you like as you are a blind fan of Shrimali, you must have heard about Trijata Aghori from his books, why don't you go and meet him and hear about shrimali? First find this Aghori Samsaneswor chandi in kathmandu nepal and then he can take you. Man if you have eyes to see see, ears to hear hear but you simply seem to be blind. I do not worry much cause people like you will always be there who will try not to give the right information to people but manipulate in the way only you like, after all you seem to be good in IT. Thank you.Theprofessordoctor (talk) 11:11, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what my mental inclination is here in the Wikipedia page. I'm trying to be neutral and following the rules of Wikipedia. Also please do not try to write your personal views here. There are hundreds of other places where you could. Saravana Kumar K (talk) 11:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Gopinath might actually be speaking about Siddhashram. However without citations, it would not make the entry valid in Wikipedia. Saravana Kumar K (talk) 11:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Amarpur[edit]

I would like to know, why people are adding the Amarpur link to this Article. Saravana Kumar K (talk) 09:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Siddhashrama or Siddhashram[edit]

I believe the proper English transliteration of सिद्धाश्रम is Siddhashram. I think the article should be renamed back to Siddhashram.

Any person reading the above Devanagiri script would read it as Siddhashram. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksaravanakumar (talkcontribs) 08:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Saravana Kumar K (talk) 08:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

In Sanskrit (written in any script, including Devanagari), if a lone consonant is written without any following vowel, it is given a halanta/virāma diacritic below (exmple: प्). If it not there, it is to pronounced with vowel "a" after it. For example, Please see Ashrama. Please see Sanskrit#Phonology also. In Hindi and Marathi (also written in Devanagari),it is not so.Joy1963 (talk) 12:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

OK I'm not too much into Sanskrit. Saravana Kumar K (talk) 14:13, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

See Also[edit]

facebook siddhashram link[edit]

someone had given a facebook siddhashram page link here, but it is a clear-cut advertisement of that page and Dr. Narayan Dutt Shrimali. it is violating wikipedia's terms and conditions. that link must be deleted. kindly stop any kind of self promotion like activities. Lnhonestbuddy (talk) 13:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)