Talk:Siege of Klis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Siege of Klis has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Croatia (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Siege of Klis is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Ottoman Empire (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ottoman Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ottoman Empire and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. WikiProject icon
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated GA-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality assessment scale.
WikiProject European history (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Siege of Klis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 12:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Well-written:
  • After making some grammatical corrections and minor word tweaks, the prose of the content seems in good order, and the content follows MOS guidelines. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
(c) it contains no original research
  • Broad in its coverage:
  • The article seems to cover all important aspects of the topic for which reliable information is available, and does not contain anything trivial. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After checking the article thoroughly and making some minor improvements, I feel it is well-ready for GA status. Congratulations! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, this was fast! :) Again, thanks for help with grammar. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome! :) Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)