This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Richard Wagner, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Richard WagnerWikipedia:WikiProject Richard WagnerTemplate:WikiProject Richard WagnerRichard Wagner articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Siegfried Idyll/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s)
Press [show] to view →
==Rating by Richard Wagner Project==
Stub class. Good introduction but further, full development needed including analysis of the music, critical appreciation etc. also removal of trivia. -- Kleinzach 05:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Low Start class, as it does not fit the definition of Stub in Wikipedia:Assessment. Further development per Kleinzach is certainly possible and necessary (and sources/references need to be added and the irrelevant external link removed). --GuillaumeTell 16:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
19/80. Strong stub. A strong start on the background. Tackling one of the missing sections properly (e.g. the recordings) should get this comfortably to start class
Background 9/15. There should be more info about composition history available
Performance history 5/15 I would expect some indication of how often it is given by chamber ensmble, how often by orchestra with reference e.g. to programmes of major orchestras. First performance could mention involvmnet of people such as Richter. Some details in Cosima's diary.
Critical opinion discussion of the music 4/15. Needs analysis of the music and further indication of what elements of the opera are influenced and any moves on the opposite direction.
Recordings 0/10
Illustrations 0/10 Plenty of choice of illustrations of Cosima, Tribschen or RW himself. Musical extracts could help.
Referencing, sources, links etc 1/15. Not the most useful of links. Derivation of music needs a citation.--Peter cohen 11:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Last edited at 14:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC).
Substituted at 06:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
