Talk:Sino-Arab relations

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arab world Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chinese people of arab descent[edit]

Article on chinese descendants of an arab who came to china hundreds of years ago

http://big5.cctv.com/geography/20041013/101708.shtml

Tseeboor (talk) 03:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CHAU JU-KUA: His Work on the Chinese and Arab Trade in the twelfth and thirteenth Centuries[edit]

http://library.uoregon.edu/ec/e-asia/reada/chau-ju-kua.pdf

Rajmaan (talk) 01:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 March 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: NO CONSENSUS. Hadal (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– Virtually all bilateral/multilateral relations articles follow this format. --Relisted. — Amakuru (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Charles Essie (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per other articles similarly categorised. Greg Kaye 11:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Charles Essie would this not limit the scope of the article to just relations between the Arab league and China, considering the historical background in relations between the Arabs and the Chinese. Also what about Chinese relations between individual Arab states? I would support a move to Arab-Sino relations in keeping with the other already existing names. Mbcap (talk) 02:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support all, but strong support the first,~~ Support a move away from "Sino", regardless of "Arab", and otherwise just support Arab-Eritrean. ~~Red Slash 04:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)~~ Red Slash 20:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose for Sino-Arab relations; look at the article! Basically nothing is about the relations of the Arab League, and instead it's about "Arabs" in general in eras long before the Arab League existed. Oppose for Arab-American relations; there's a single reference in the lede, but the majority of the article is on "Arabs" (well, disconnected incidents involving it) and not the "Arab League." Weak oppose for Arab–Pakistan relations, that seems like a confused article, but it seems like it more wants to be about the relations with various individual Arab states, not the Arab League itself. Support for Arab–Eritrean relations, the sole article of which seems to focus on relations with the Arab League. Anyway, "Arab League" is not a synonym for "Arabs" any more than "United Nations" is a synonym for "Humans" or "OAS" is a synonym for "Latin Americans." SnowFire (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sino-Russian relations since 1991 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]