Talk:Site-specific browser
| WikiProject Computing / Software | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Internet | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Contents |
Mobile applications [edit]
Is Nokia WRT an example of a SSB? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.3.234.11 (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Internal consistency issue: the mobile applications section currently assumes that the definition of "site-specific browser" is the more specific meaning previously given to "general purpose site-specific browser"... there are certainly many mobile applications for iPhone and Android, if not other platforms as well, which consist of dedicated web browsers for a single website. 76.179.16.229 (talk) 16:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Merge/link to... [edit]
Augmented browsing. No? --69.125.2.186 (talk) 23:51, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
GreaseMonkey, augmentation and task-specific/domain-specific browser tech [edit]
The Greasemonkey article is now more informative in the section Equivalents for other browsers.
We need to re-design this article in terms of site-domain-task.
When I am running Mobi, Rikeichan, Rikeisama or PeraPera on FireFox, my browser becomes a different tool because those extensions work in Text Areas on my own local web pages. One unexpected result is that they render Google Translate otiose.
Those evolving plugins/extensions conflict with each other on Firefox - just one exmaple of how far we have to go in such a simple thing as a non-Japanese web user having an effective user experience at Japanese web pages or non-Japanese pages devoted to Nihongo content such as Haiku at wikisource or wikibooks.
Those extensions also have word list options - something which flashcards-in-the-browser are slow to adopt for web language learners (and so my continued interest in Curl programming language CSPD.)
None of the current changes involve add-on's for Text tasks which are themselves written in smart text-oriented languages such as Icon (Unicon, Object Icon) or smart parsing languages such as PEG-equivalent Rebol or rule languages such as SWI-Prolog.
Strikingly, for me, no Smalltalk variant has yet produced a browser (and the Squeak Sophie e-text project appears to have failed.)
--Grshiplett (talk • contribs) 20:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Gollum as a WP SSB [edit]
Could Gollum browser be mentioned as a multilingual SSB for wikipedia.org ? --Grshiplett (talk • contribs) 14:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Unassessed software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- All Software articles
- Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Computing articles
- Unassessed Internet articles
- Unknown-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles