|Six Sigma received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.|
|This page was nominated for deletion on December 6 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep.|
|WikiProject Business||(Rated C-class, High-importance)|
|WikiProject Technology||(Rated C-class)|
Isn't there any criticism?
This sort of crap is a load of horse-shit, invented by idiots who have little to do and a lot of time on their hands, to invent garbage ideas to 'prove' their worth. Is there no criticism of this utter, absolute nonsense? it is used for the process improvement and helps in organization maturity — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2011 (UTC) It has also been shown to save a remarkable amount of money for companies who have successfully implemented it. Like other quality methodologies, its value is only as good as its champion's commitment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 19:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC) PLEASE STOP CALLING SIX SIGMA A "STRATEGY." IT IS NOT A STRATEGY. IT IS AN EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skridgley (talk • contribs) 02:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Large public companies are basically required to claim tangible results for unmeasurables. It's only remarkable that people take these reports of savings as actionable information. [ bÐ i (220.127.116.11) 2014-08-01 09:26 UTC ]
Does anyone else notice that before Six Sigma, Motorola were a microprocessor developer beloved by all, but since then they've become a shit phone company?
Yup, I think that just about sums the whole thing up, contributor. It's all a load of twaddle, job creation for many though ! The (American parent) company I worked for was, and probably still is, heavily into Six Sigma and steadily declined over a decade or so due to poor management. Interestingly, most of the management that moved on were SS black belts ! Cabinscooter (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
2011 Discussion - Certification
Unlike Project Management, HR or ROI Methodology, ix Sigma does not have a standard certifying body, there are several different organizations that certify individuals who complete the courses.
Based on this I added one of the recognized institutions that offers courses and certifications to those interested in Six Sigma training (green, black, master belts).
The link was removed the following day and tagged as commercial. I understand the desire to remove spammy links from the pages, but this is a legitimate university with a distinguished reputation and an online option, as many universities are moving to offer.
If you feel the link should not be included, that's ok. I feel it adds another option for those seeking professional education. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoBlueWhite (talk • contribs) 19:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. It is certainly promotional to me, you are promoting this website as an authority on the subject.Pm master 10:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- The best solution is to restrict ourselves to certification bodies mentioned in independent reliable secondary sources. --JN466 22:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is still ongoing, with a number of prominent and not so prominent firms being added and re-added without independent, secondary sourcing. . That is not okay. The ASQ and IQF are there by rights; they are mentioned as certifiers in many, many secondary sources that are independent of them. The cited book mentions the Juran Institute, Qualtec and Air Academy, which are also frequently mentioned in the literature. No others should be added without a secondary source, and evidence that they are at least equally prominent in the literature. Otherwise we will end up with a list of 50 companies, down to the Six Sigma trainer working from his garden office. --JN466 23:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)