Talk:Sonic the Hedgehog CD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Video games (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Sega task force.
 


Place within main continuity[edit]

There's some dispute over whether this takes place after or before Sonic 2. I think it takes place AFTER as it was developed after the second game, but some think it's set BEFORE that. I strongly disagree despite the reuse of Sonic's sprite from the first game.Visokor (talk) 16:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Sprites,Spindash is slower,no tails nor knuckles,it makes so much scene,besides I red the Manuel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 16:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

From a development standpoint, the complication arises in the fact that both games were in development at the same time for a while, it's just that Sonic 2 was released first.
From a practical standpoint, I don't think it needs to be mentioned either way. The Sonic Genesis games had virtually no plot, and virtually no continuity between games, so it doesn't even need to be mentioned. Sergecross73 msg me 16:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
The fact that no reliable sources have been added to support either opinion also means that it shouldn't be added. - X201 (talk) 16:25, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Yes it does.~Tailsman67~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 16:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
This is not the first time your have resolved to such a baseless argument. Do you think you prove a point with logic like that? Sergecross73 msg me 16:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah!Why are you people so hard headed when it come to the things right in front of you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Half of your responses are so sloppy I can't even understand what you're trying to say, they're riddle with typos, no spaces, spelling errors, and logical flaws. Secondly, you haven't provided any reliable sources that back up your stance, or any reason to believe you for that matter. Sergecross73 msg me 16:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Where did Sonic Generations put Stardust Speedway,cause Generations put the levels in order from story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 16:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
I don't know, I haven't played it. You can look it up yourself if you want, as its your theory, but regardless, even if you figure out the order, using that as your source would probably kind of fall under original research or synthesis, both of which would be frowned upon. Not that it matters because, again, it wouldn't change the fact that there is virtually no continuity between Sonic 1, CD, or 2 anyways. Sergecross73 msg me 20:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Sonic CD came after Sonic 1,there is a lot of evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.49.191 (talk) 16:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
No one's contesting the release dates. The issue was whether or not the plots/stories lead into one another. So far no one has presented a source, not to mention, the plots are so bare in these games to begin with, it doesn't seem all that important to note either way... Sergecross73 msg me 16:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I know that.It is right in front of you,the storyline,the sprites,look at Sonic Retro see what they say,look at the Sonic Channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.49.191 (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
If it's "right in front of us", you should have no problem providing proof. Sergecross73 msg me 16:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
You look it up your damn self,cause I know it is out there.Notability is finally being used as a stick to keep articles small.Pat yourself on the back on the back for a job well done, boys.Not only do potentially good articles get deleted these days, but now the articles that they are merged to are kept too small to be useful.Wikipedia has lost its value as a reference source.Wikipedia should be the first place the people come to get information. Instead it has become the second or the third. It comes as no surprise to me that off-site projects are now becoming a safe haven for the encyclopedic content that used to be hosted here.
Until pages on the wiki are actually allowed to grow into useful articles, Wikipedia will never be anything more than a collection of related information. The glue that made it a genuine encyclopedia has been lost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.49.191 (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
WP:BURDEN. Rant about your perceived shortcomings of wikipedia elsewhere. Sergecross73 msg me 16:43, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I'll find your source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.49.191 (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Suggested Archive[edit]

Someone should get this page archived as their is a lots of information here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokeyfire (talkcontribs) 04:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - X201 (talk) 15:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

What about the Creepyness?[edit]

i think i'll add a sub-gameplay about creepy gaming. Jct400thz (talk) 18:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not, unless you find that reliable sources are reporting on it. I highly doubt that they are... Sergecross73 msg me 18:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Sound Test?[edit]

Why not include the sound test code and the secret stuff you can access from it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.64.96.46 (talk) 02:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Because Wikipedia is not a game guide. Sergecross73 msg me 03:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)