Talk:Southern right whale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Cetaceans (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cetaceans on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


Is this the same as the "Southern Wright Whale"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aetheogamous (talkcontribs) 20:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:CETA capitalisation discussion[edit]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bowhead Whale which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 02:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Work needed[edit]

The fact that the three right whale species are so similar implies that most of the info in them should be the same. Should we factor the common info into the genus article? for instance, that article already has the bowhead as a right whale.

NZ population estimate is grossly wrong[edit] (talk) 03:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)The article states: "Population estimates in New Zealand waters has risen from 16,000 to 22,000-32,000[18], a record high".

This figure is about three orders of magnitude too high and appears to be a misquotation from the Otago Daily Times article, which referred to historic numbers in the Southern Ocean.

Conservation status symbol things.[edit]

Wait a second, the stuff mentioned under Conservation and the Conservation status symbols do not match. Either one is out-dated or someone's been messing with it, the symbol says it is in the "Least Concern" category while the article says it should be endangered. Can someone take a look at this? - (talk) 07:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Archaeological evidence from Spain[edit]

An interesting article just published: Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban (2014). "Occurrence of whale barnacles in Nerja Cave (Málaga, southern Spain): Indirect evidence of whale consumption by humans in the Upper Magdalenian". Quaternary International 337: 163–169. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.01.014.  edit.

In short, barnacles from a species which is currently only found on the southern right whale have been identified in a Spanish cave, dating to ~14,000 years ago; this was near the end of the last glacial period, and the authors suggest that this may be the result of changes to ocean circulation cooling the waters around the Equator and allowing the southern populations to drift north. (They also note the alternative that an individual simply got lost!) Perhaps worth mentioning in passing in the distribution section - are there any other known cases of a southern right outside of the normal range? Andrew Gray (talk) 15:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

"Real whale rider"[edit]

I commented out the following section because the only source was an undocumented Facebook photo: Legends of the Whale Rider are renowned in New Zealand, and real riders can be seen occasionally [1]. Galant Khan (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)