Talk:Space Hijackers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Organizations  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Organizations. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United Kingdom  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Advertisement?[edit]

This page seems like it is an advertisement for a group called "Space Hijackers". It is not written from a NPOV - see "who battle to save our streets"; "the evils of Urban Architects"

Does this article belong here? Does it just jeed to be cleaned up? Is thiis valid?

Posted by: SSherris 20:57, 18 May 2004 (UTC)

Rather agree with you but, for the moment, have made it rather more NPOV than it was and added some wikilinks to make more sense of it. --VampWillow 00:48, 31 May 2004 (UTC)

As it is, this article doesn't provide much useful information and isn't very encyclopedic at all. It does indeed seem to serve primarily as a tool to advertise the group's existence. I suppose it could be edited into a better article in the future, though. Mr. Billion 04:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I don't get it.[edit]

What is this group about then? They are anti-buildings? This is a very badly written article. I don't feel I've learnt anything from it.

They're known in some circles for their antics, the article should stay, though be improved. They are not anti-buildings, but rather anti-being-controlled. Against being told what to do by design, which extends to active protest against a number of things which may incidentally have a political edge (e.g. ban on protests within 1 mile of parliament). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 161.73.37.81 (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC).


Some of their sites are used for phishing e.g. altabalipark.co.uk asks for name and address details and NI number. Presumably some of them are simply crooks masquarading as anarchists —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.213.110.4 (talk) 15:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)