Talk:Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Temazepam as an S8?[edit]

As far as I am aware, temazepam is an S4D drug, certainly not S8 in the same league as flunitrazepam. Abuse was curbed by withdrawing gelcaps from the market and applying stricter controls on PBS supply. Can someone verify/rectify this? Thanks. 58.165.100.62 (talk) 11:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In NSW, temazepam is definitely S4D. I'm not sure about the other states. There are differences between states in scheduling. I think large packs of Nurofen Plus is S3 in Victoria and S2 in NSW. There is going to be some confusion if people from different states edit this page - probably need to do something about this.--Cidofovir9017 (talk) 07:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Temazepam is S4 as shown here. I've reverted again. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Australia vs World[edit]

This page should be renamed or some other step should be taken to make it clear that this is a summary of Australian standards. It is not immediately clear in the page title or heading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.131.50.41 (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tasmania[edit]

Tasmania is omitted, and has an S4D schedule also 131.217.6.7 (talk) 06:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unedited content on page[edit]

This diff shows some edits that have been made to this article which need to be cleaned up. Simon Wright (talk) 23:33, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

S100 HSD[edit]

The article is missing a section on Schedule 100 Highly Specialised Drugs eg HIV antivirals, opiate substitution program etc. Someone ought to write one. D.R. du Prie 10:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duprie37 (talkcontribs)