Talk:Staplehurst

Kent Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Moved. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Staplehurst, Kent → Staplehurst — I'll explain below. —Parable1991 (talk) 05:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Support - This is undoubtedly the primary usage of the name. It is the original Staplehurst and is 22x the size of the second Staplehurst. It is also well-known in history as the city in which Charles Dickens was involved in a railway crash. Parable1991 (talk) 05:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I see no problems here. EJF (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator. Terraxos (talk) 03:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

hhh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.1.90 (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Staplehurst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120904183558/http://www.mytimemachine.co.uk/dickens.htm to http://www.mytimemachine.co.uk/dickens.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Village or town?[edit]

The article has called it a village for most of its existence, but this has since been changed to town, back to village, and back to town.

Googling for the two words "Staplehurst town" (not in quotes, ie not necessarily adjacent", finds three articles which call it a town, eg this, and n-3 which call it a village including neighbourhood plan, local media, tourist info etc. Is there any evidence that it's a town? PamD 09:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Staplehurst is a village. If there is going to be an edit war over this, the article will be locked and my banhammer will be woken from its slumber. I'm going to watchlist this article for a while. You have been warned. Mjroots (talk) 07:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]