Talk:Stardust (Willie Nelson album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Stardust (Willie Nelson album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
December 4, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Albums (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Country Music (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Stardust (Willie Nelson album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Looks nice :)! I remember it stubby, but now... another great article

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • ISBN/ISSN check: The short footnote's 13 and the book reference's date are different
  • Dabsolver check: fixed two dabs
  • Checklinks check: ok
  • Reflinks check: ok
  • Fixed dashes
  • Do you agree with this edit? I think it was reasonable; if you agree with me, then their rating and refs should be removed.
  • On hold I give you time to fix these issues.
  • Pass I changed the date for the Draper Robert short footnotes (1991->1986 as the reference below suggest October 11 1986 as date). Also as a test I found the October 11 Billboard magazine, and looking at the front cover, I think it was the correct magazine and my edit accurate.