This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Per a search in this copyright renewal file, there are no issues with copyright renewed before 1950, nor any cover art renewed, though many stories are copyrighted. Per a search here, all issues from November 1950 onwards are copyrighted. So the first 64 issues are out of copyright except for specific stories, and the last 35 issues are copyrighted. Mike Christie (talk – library) 01:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Need to clarify the issues with editorship at the end -- Ewald says Samalman and Kastle together for the last four and quotes Kastle from Reginald. Also need to check the issues themselves.
Ewald says: "Alexander Samalman and Herbert D. Kastle, Winter - Fall 1955, last four issues." He adds that in Reginald vol 2 p. 957 Kastle "claims to have 'officiated over the death of Startling Stories'". Mike Christie (talk – library) 01:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Tuck says the last four issues were edited by Samalman; so does Malcolm Edwards in the Nicholls.
Ashley in Transformations says Raines, then Kastle; he's the leading expert and that's the most recent source, so I will use that. Might need to add a note. Also checked the magazines themselves; the indicia and masthead do not name the editor for these issues.
Add a note on Bergey based on Jan 1950 cover and note in Di Fate's Infinite Worlds.
Note that "gravity-defying" can be sourced from Infinite Worlds p. 32 if necessary, though I think the multi-image caption doesn't need separate sourcing.
There are a couple of strings of three or four citations together; those can probably be reduced.
Scan covers -- need a copy of a sober-looking post-font-change Bergey -- maybe the upside girl in the space ship with the spacemen outside with the cutting torch?
An editor has placed a tag indicating possible excessive fair use. There are six fair use images of magazine covers in the article at the moment. I think all six can be justified, as follows.
January 1950: specific commentary about the artwork on that cover by an sf art historian
May 1953: illustrates two stylistic changes, both of which are commented on in the article -- the typeface and the more realistic artwork
Fall 1944; Winter 1946; March 1950; July 1950: these illustrate the cumulative effect of multiple stereotypes in sf illustration at that time. There is substantial commentary on these stereotypes, and because it is the cumulative effect that is being commented on, multiple examples are appropriate. Each cover illustrates a specific stereotype and there is specific commentary associated with it.
All of the commentary is sourced to reliable sources. I'll wait a month or so to see if there are comments. If nobody objects I'll remove the tag at that time. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)