This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Being as referendums are questions asked to an electorate it would be good to say upfront what the question was rather than just saying that the referendum was about the future form of government Tommo_87—Preceding undated comment added 11:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC).
first dien bien phu didn't ended the war it was the geneva agreements. the Geneva conference started during the battle of dien bien phu. the french wanted to use the victorious battle (they were sure to win DBP) as a political pressure measure against Ho Chi Minh. Ho Chi Minh used the battle the same way and thanks to Giap's strategy and a massive chinese support (trucks, heavy artillery, katysuha) the french chief of staff leader Navarre did not believed despite intelligence reports, and so the viet minh won the siege after ceasefire order was given to the french garrison from Saigon based Cogny. second there is no mention about Bao Dai's State of Vietnam that existed from 1949 to 1955 prior to these elections. the current article is strongly oriented and does not follow the neutrality policy. Paris By Night 21:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Can you check to see if the background is factually solid? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nominee for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of September 2, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
1. Well written?: yes
2. Factually accurate?: yes
3. Broad in coverage?: yes
4. Neutral point of view?: yes
5. Article stability? yes
6. Images?: Looks good.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — T Rex | talk 01:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Is there any current article on the canceled 1956 election?
Is there any current article on the canceled 1956 Vietnam election? I see scant references to the election, but I see no article on what lead up to the cancelation. Travb (talk) 06:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
No need. I was under the mistaken impression, from reading leftists books, that the US was behind the cancelation. It is much more nuianced than this. If you do decide to write the article, see User_talk:Travb#References_on_Vietnam_election which has referenced quotes from four books. Thanks for the response. Travb (talk) 07:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
This article keeps calling Bảo Đại "emperor", but he abdicated back in 1945. In 1949-55, his title was "head of state" (Quoc Truong). So there was no issue of monarchy involved in the referendum -- it was just Bảo Đại vs. Diệm. Kauffner (talk) 13:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)