|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stevie Wonder article.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3|
|Stevie Wonder has been listed as a level-4 vital article in People. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as C-Class.|
|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.|
|This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details.|
|Sources for development of this article may be located at|
Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2014
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
Stevie sang and played harmonica on "Someday" by the GAP Band.
- Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. Technical 13 (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
SilkTork, for the most part, I like your changes, but per WP:WikiProject Musicians/Article guidelines#Discography section and WP:Manual of Style (lists of works)#Discographies, if a musician has his own discography article, the discography section of the musician's primary article should only provide a summary of the musician's major works using a simple list of their studio albums. Only for artists without separate discography pages should there be extra information, such as record labels, chart positions, etc., because it's just unnecessary redundancy. --Musdan77 (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Caption under the main image
The caption, as of writing this, is 'Stevie Wonder in 1973, at an early stage of his "classic period"'. My suggestion is 'Stevie Wonder performing in 1973'. My problem with the current caption is that it's not succinct enough, contains redundant information (you can read in the article that what's considered his 'classic period' started in about 1972, which naturally leads the reader to knowing that 1973 is an early stage of his classic period, as long as they have extremely basic math skills), and it offers information that, to the new learner about Stevie Wonder, can be confusing. It doesn't explain what his classic period was, it just says it was at the beginning of his classic period. A new learner might be pushed away by this lack of explanation. You have to read further into the article for it to be informative, which largely defeats the point of having it in the caption anyway, especially when the only people who will understand it from the caption are people who are already familiar with his classic period, who probably could already figure out that 1973 is an early year in that. My suggestion is still informative, and provides information that anybody can clearly understand.
The reason why I think these reasons matter is that 1. it looks better and feels better to read which I think should be a goal for a Wikipedia writer, 2. it conforms more to the guidelines on the page Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions. If we look there, the first guideline is:
"A good caption 1. clearly identifies the subject of the picture, without detailing the obvious. 2. is succinct. 3. establishes the picture's relevance to the article. 4. provides context for the picture. 5. draws the reader into the article."
I think that all of these goals are better achieved by shortening the caption to "Stevie Wonder performing in 1973".
Additionally, if we look at another article for reference, one that's even featured, Michael Jackson, we can see that the caption in that article, as of writing this, is "Michael Jackson performing in 1988", which is similarly clear and succinct. You could also edit that one to "Michael Jackson performing in 1988 during his Bad Tour", but that's not necessary for having a clear, informative caption. That MJ caption, in particular, would be more clear to the brand new learner, though, than anything about a "classic period", because tours are commonplace and well-understood whereas Stevie Wonder is the only artist (at least that I know of) to have what many people refer to as his classic period.
Again, my suggestion is Stevie Wonder performing in 1973 (without the bold) for the main image caption. I'll edit it myself in a few days if this doesn't get any responses by then. If you disagree, please respond with your argument. Thank you for reading and have a nice day! :) Ironbirdiemix (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Tend to agree. Although I always try to slip in the actual location too (in the case apparently a Motown recording studio, but the source is unclear.) Martinevans123 (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- You're right (I'm wondering why I didn't make that change myself) ...except that -- only the last name should be used for the subject of the article, because his first name is in the infobox title above. --Musdan77 (talk) 03:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- So are we sure he was "performing" or was he just just "recording" in the studio? I realise there is some overlap in these terms, but the stance, headphones and type of microphone suggest very strongly that this is no "a performance". I suspect the signed photo from which this image was taken (originally an eBay item) was a stock publicity shot, take in the Motown studio, for sending out to fans, etc. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2014
|This edit request has been answered. Set the
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 09:57, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Songs In The Key Of Life - Ranking on Rolling Stone Top 500 Albums
This article states that SITKOL ranks 56th on this list, but I followed the link, and the RS site has it at 57th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 13:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Discrepancy of number of children with current woman, and newest daughter is born. 
- Unlikely to be mistaken, but do you have a better source? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- https://celebrity.yahoo.com/news/stevie-wonder-welcomes-ninth-child-baby-girl-named-011000134-us-weekly.html. Missing or empty