Talk:Stitch (Lilo & Stitch)

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Syfy interview with Chris Sanders (Weiss, Josh. (September 13, 2022) "Original co-director of 'Lilo & Stitch' has thoughts about the live-action remake". Syfy.)

On 8 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Stitch (Lilo and Stitch). The result of the discussion was moved to Stitch (Lilo & Stitch).

Notability[edit]

I'm not entirely convinced this is independently notable, and it has a lot of unsourced claims that are presented from a rather in-universe style. Are there any verifiable details about this character's concept and development from a real-world perspective? It may be better to merge this with List of Lilo & Stitch characters. Mz7 (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just provided a new section with some cited information about Chris Sanders's development of the character, and did some rewriting for the article. It's not much to start out with—the legitimate concerns over in-universe writing and original research still need to be worked out—but hopefully this will lead to the article being reworked into something that's much informative than before. --WPA (talk) 02:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 July 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Stitch (Lilo & Stitch). (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 16:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stitch (Disney) → Stitch (Lilo and Stitch) – Per Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(films)#Character_articles, we should be using the movie title as parenthetical disambiguation.. Interstellarity (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but use the correct rendering of the film and franchise's title (i.e. Stitch (Lilo & Stitch)) – The amper sand matters. Besides that, the article's current title of "Stitch (Disney)" is actually somewhat ambiguous because it can refer to the Disney franchise as a whole—which is often shortened to Stitch thanks to the post-2006 spin-offs (i.e. Stitch!, Stitch & Ai, and Stitch & the Samurai)—instead of just the title alien character. That said, it could also be moved to Stitch (Disney character) instead if there's resistance to using the film's name due to said spin-offs. –WPA (talk) 04:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.