The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is part of Blogging WikiProject, an attempt to build better coverage of Blogging on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the Project Page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I feel that the description of the blog as describing not all white people but "a stereotype of affluent, environmentally and socially conscious, anti-corporate white North American hipsters, who typically hold a degree in the liberal arts", is missing the point. Part of the point of the blog is pointing out that white privilege allows us to think about white people as "unique individuals" and say exactly that, as oppose to drawing conclusions about all white people based on a small group. Part of the point of the blog is that he is using (insert adjective) hipsters to act as representations of white people, something that generally our privilege allows us to avoid. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
When you live among SWPLs, you can see that whenever they use the term "White" and it isn't immediately followed by "racist" it might as well be synonymous with SWPL. But this sounds like original research. Not that there is anything wrong with that, half the encyclopedia is original research, but if you can give a source for your theory, you can put it in.Joe B Lan (talk) 03:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
I think it should be mentioned that "SWPL," sometimes written "Swipple," is used as a (usually derogatory) noun denoting the type of people Lander describes. It's fairly common on right-wing / non-PC blogs. (I suppose this is "original research," but the phenomenon is glaringly obvious.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 11:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
If it's original research it can't go on the page. Personally I would say the main problem though is that there don't seem to be any mainstream news sources using it that way, just blogs. And UrbanDictionary, which is a user-edited site and therefore also ineligible. —Soap— 11:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)