Talk:Sub Club

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a club or group that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject."

  • The club has been voted the 10th best club in the world by one of the most respected music & club & dj magazines in the world.

If this fails the criteria in order for speedy deletion then please peruse the following similar pages: TheArches (Glasgow) & Fabric (club)

The former especially, does not look particularly different in content. The history, style and output can be expanded to compare with the latter SelfishGenie (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Even worse examples of club-related pages can be found here, for other Glasgow 'clubs'. These places, especially Tiger Tiger and the Garage, are so unremarkable and lack any musical substance or originality that I'm surprised that they were not speedily deleted long ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nightclubs_in_Glasgow

82.27.229.127 (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Pointing out that other articles are shite doesn't change the fact that this one is shite as well. Anyway, I had a crack at sorting the article out a wee bit. Thoughts?

--cloudo (talk) 01:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


  • You added some good points to the article, but you can't polish a turd. I think the original discussion points were not attacking the other articles themselves but rather the fact that notability warnings had been placed upon this one, while those clubs of similar importance (Arches) or of lesser importance (Garage, Tiger Tiger) in the Glasgow music/club scene had eschewed such categorisation. I see that the Garage now has the same warning placed upon it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SelfishGenie (talk • contribs) 10:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


  • I guess polishing turds is what wikipedia is built on in a way. I added the tag to the Garage article, because the article was very poor. i think a good bit of digging about for references and history facts and you could get a pretty decent article out of the Sub Club. The same probably couldn't be said for The Garage.--cloudo (talk) 13:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sub Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sub_Club&oldid=1201187603"