Jump to content

Talk:Sunan Abi Dawud

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Sunan Abi Dawood)

Move article

[edit]

Can I move this article to Sunan Abu Dawood as it is the most commonly used name for the book --Notedgrant (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC) Although you already went forth with changing the name of this article, the actual name of this book is Sunan Abi Dawood, the second word having an 'i' due to the conjunction. You should have checked with someone first.Supertouch (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a second the authour is abu dawood the book was named after him (Abu Dawood correct me If I'm wrong ,You can undo my move if you wish to do so --Notedgrant (talk) 17:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the Arabic language the grammatical relationship between words is reflected by changing the last vowel of the word, and in limited number of cases, such as the word 'abu' these changes are reflected by changing the final letter which is a long vowel. Therefore, in some cases the word 'abu' would be abu, abi or aba. Since the title of this page is written in transliterated Arabic it hardly seems necessary to sticklers. Supertouch (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You sure do know a lot about Arabic should I revert my move ? --Notedgrant (talk) 14:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's Arabic 101. It doesn't seem necessary to re-re-move the article. Several years ago I had an Arabic teacher who taught us the aforementioned grammatical point and then asked us why the English translation of Sunan Abu Dawood (the old one< not Dar al-Salam) was Abu contrary to Arabic Grammar. He answered his own question by responding that Arabic grammar doesn't apply when using Arabic words as a part of English speech. After last night's editwar it was nice to hear some positivity on Wikipedia... Supertouch (talk) 14:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

some people use this site only to flame others :D.You've got quite a lot of knowledge Have a good time editing :D And wish you a happy Ramadan :D --Notedgrant (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The correct form is Sunan Abî Dâwûd, not: Sunan Abû Dâwûd. The Arabic wikipedia article is called Sunan Abî Dâwûd too. The reason is that the word Abû is in the genitive case, which is Abî, "Sunan Abî Dâwûd" meaning "Abû Dâwûd's traditions". The change from Abû to Abî is the equivalent of the English ending -'s. That is Arabic declension. However, many Arabs get this wrong too, because the declension is not part of the modern dialects of Arabic. So yeah, "Sunan Abî Dâwûd" is more correct, the article should be moved. However, it is not a cardinal mistake to say "Sunan Abû Dâwûd"...
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sunan Abu Dawood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]